N E W Y O R K C I T Y
Supporting Organizations to Improve Migrants' Access to Health Services
Supporting Organizations to Improve Migrants’ Access to Health Services in New York City
CIRGH surveyed community-based, migrant-serving organizations (MSOs) in New York City (NYC) regarding their experiences early during the COVID-19 pandemic and perspectives on academic collaborations. Thirty-eight MSOs identified COVID-19-related challenges, including limited staff capacity, organizational funding, and technological and resource limitations of communities served. Organizational capacity correlated with types of services offered. MSOs indicated interest in collaboration on migrant policy advocacy and communications, access to interns, and resources regarding best practices and policies.
Key Study Findings
- Organizational capacity is somewhat correlated with number of groups served and types of services offered:
- Smaller organizations tend to offer health and social services, i.e., more day-to-day “survival” assistance
- Larger organizations report greater involvement in areas related to education and employment
- All organizations offer legal assistance
- Fear and ineligibility due to legal status are the service barriers cited most frequently
- Topics and resources frequently identified for support include: support for advocacy and communications around migrant policy (86%), provision of best practices and policies through a resource hub (55%), access to interns (55%), connections to researchers (50%), and convening spaces (50%)
In January 2021, CIRGH launched a cross-sectional survey of migrant-serving organizations (MSOs) in NYC to collect important information on their early experience with COVID-19 while being cognizant to minimize demands on their limited time and resources. Additionally, as an academic research institution whose mission is to advance public health within a social justice framework, we were interested in determining if MSOs would be interested in collaboratively developing a migrant health resource hub and in what ways it might be useful. We developed a brief survey focusing on three domains:
- General organizational information (i.e., staff, budget, target populations);
- Special challenges (service or policy-related) posed by COVID-19; and
- Interest in learning more about and collaborating with the Center.
The survey found that community-based organizations in NYC fill a critical service gap for immigrants and refugees, with a majority of MSOs surveyed serving multiple populations and offering multiple types of services, including legal assistance, social services, education, health, and employment assistance. Most organizations served undocumented individuals (97.4%), lawful permanent residents (84.2%), and naturalized citizens (78.9%), with fewer services related to student visa holders (34.2%), employment-based visa holders (39.5%), and unaccompanied child migrants (39.5%).
Types of services offered (%, n)
30 CBOs offer 2+ types of services
CBOs provide an average of 3 services
Impact of COVID-19 on Organizational Operations
We also assessed the impact of COVID-19 on migrant-serving MSOs, including those with a specific focus on health, regarding limitations in the five areas of funding, staff capacity, technological capacity of communities served, resources in communities served, and difficulty working remotely, as well as other issues reported by respondents. Limited funding was reported by about half of the sample. Health-focused organizations were more likely to report limited staff capacity than non-health organizations (63% vs. 27%), as well as limited resources in communities served (69% vs. 50%) and difficulty working remotely (37% vs. 27%). Limited technological capacity of communities served was reported more by non-health focused organizations (64%) than by health-focused organizations (56%). Other less frequent issues related to COVID-19 were court closures, remote learning, and limited operating space.
Factors facilitating or hindering the access of organization’s clients to programs and services
We included an open-ended question on the factors hindering migrant access to programs and services and subjected the responses to word-cloud analysis, which identified the words ineligible, fear, undocumented, and unemployed as the most prominent. Further thematic analysis resulted in three substantive categories: 1) ineligible for CARE Act; 2) fear of seeking services due to migrant status, COVID-19, public charge risk, etc.; and 3) lack of information/knowledge on how to acquire aid and other services. Analysis by organizational type revealed that non-health focused MSOs more often reported ineligibility for the CARE Act as the primary problem affecting their clients compared to health-focused MSOs (36% vs. 19%). Fear of seeking services was reported by 31% of health-focused MSOs, while just 14% of non-health focused MSOs raised the issue. Lack of information/knowledge regarding services was evenly distributed.
Scaling the Effort
The NYC-focused MSO study is being scaled into a statewide intervention in 2022. The decision to broaden the scope of the intervention to the state level is rooted in the understanding that NYC is often just an entry point for migrants, with well over one million immigrants and refugees settled throughout New York State. Some cities like Buffalo have seen population growth—and an increase in federal funding—for the first time in 70 years, in large part due to the arrival of immigrant and refugee communities. Additionally, many of the policies affecting the health of migrants in New York City are designed and implemented at the state-level. Therefore, we want to foster collaboration with and between MSOs and policymakers to ensure new constituents across the state are both considered and included in policy dialogue.
In response to our findings, we are developing the Migrant Health Resource Hub (MHRH). The MHRH addresses the absence of and need for a comprehensive source of NYC/S migrant health data, research and policy information, and serves as a convener to promote statewide multi-sectoral engagement between organizations, policymakers, and researchers. The components described below will advance the activities of the MHRH and build directly on findings from our recent research with MSOs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
There is currently no comprehensive, longitudinal data source measuring migrant health in NYC/S. Using MSO/stakeholder input from the convenings, we are co-developing a survey to regularly assess the health of migrants across the state. Rooted in data equity, the longitudinal survey is being developed with the input of organizational and community stakeholders to determine what data are collected, how the data will be used, and how migrant experiences are captured.
The database will allow for monitoring migrant health over time and across New York’s ten geographic regions: Capital District, Central New York, Finger Lakes, Mid-Hudson, Long Island, Mohawk Valley, New York City, North Country, Southern Tier, and Western New York.
The hub will house a migrant health dashboard to visualize and communicate the results of the longitudinal survey, as well as the following stakeholder-identified resources: filterable map and directory of organizations and services (500+ organizations identified), programming toolkits, policy directory and briefs, interpretation and translation services, expert witness testimony services, internship matching, migrant-focused grant postings, training and certificate programs (e.g., Migrant Health Worker training, mental health and psychosocial support trainings via the Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Knowledge Hub, Assistive Technologies with International Society of Wheelchair Professionals, etc.), and pertinent open-source publications.
MSOs and other stakeholders across NYC/S lack a centralized convener and resource for fostering data/information exchange to better serve migrant communities and provide a space for policy dialogue and evidence-informed advocacy planning. The MHRH will sponsor quarterly convenings with stakeholders to advance health policy dialogue between organizations and encourage consistent stakeholder engagement and input.
CIRGH also seeks to promote intentional dialogue between organizations and city- and state-level policymakers. CIRGH and CUNY SPH have existing relationships with policymakers at the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the New York State Department of Health, putting us in a unique position to support intersectoral town hall meetings to discuss governmental policy and programming. We currently host digital convening spaces for MSOs and other relevant stakeholders, but there is interest in attending in-person meetings to discuss policy advocacy priorities in 2022.